> Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > I'm fine with starting at zero on reset, but we have already said that > 'h' starts at 1 the first time around. I'd prefer to start in the same > place each time. :)
Let's always start with 0, then.
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > I'm fine with starting at zero on reset, but we have already said that > 'h' starts at 1 the first time around. I'd prefer to start in the same > place each time. :)
Let's always start with 0, then.