On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Pedro Melo<[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2009/06/25, at 18:29, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 6/24/09 11:22 PM, Ralph Meijer wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:16:00PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>>> >>>> On 6/24/09 2:49 PM, Ralph Meijer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 14:16 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>>> >>>> [..] >>>> >>>>> Yeah, that seems ok, although I would probably keep 'Server' instead of >>>>> 'Host' and 'Receiving Server' to keep in sync with RFC 3920 and >>>>> XEP-0185. >>>> >>>> OK. So: >>>> >>>> - - Sending Domain >>>> - - Accepting Domain >>>> - - Originating Server >>>> - - Receiving Server >>>> - - Authoritative Server >>> >>> Yeah. >> >> I think I prefer SENDER DOMAIN and TARGET DOMAIN for the first two. > > +1. I didn't like sending domain and accepting domain but I hadn't any > alternatives. sender and target are much better IMHO. >
+1 to this and the other changes. I'm beginning to wish this version of the XEP was the first one I read :) Matthew
