-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Please check the text in draft-ietf-xmpp-3921bis. If it is still incorrect, post a message about this to the [email protected] list.
/psa On 7/9/09 10:43 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote: > Me Self schrieb: >> Can someone help me interpret this line from rfc 3921 section 8.2 6) that >> explain how the contacts server stores a subscribe message offline if it >> cannot be delivered to the contact: >> >> "if not, the contact's server MUST store the subscription request offline >> for delivery when this condition is next met; normally this is done by >> adding a roster item for the contact to the user's roster, with a >> state of >> "None + Pending In"" >> >> How can the contacts server add anything to the users roster which >> resides >> on another server? > > It seems like "user" and "contact" are mixed up in the last sentence. > That should probably have been: "normally this is done by adding a > roster item for the USER to the CONTACTS's roster". > >> If the roster item is meant to be stored in the contacts roster then that >> brings me to my next question. How does the contacts server determine >> if it >> can include a roster item in response to a "roster get"? Section 9.2 >> seems >> to touch this: >> >> ""None + Pending In" = contact and user are not subscribed to each other, >> and contact has sent user a subscription request but user has not replied >> yet (note: contact's server SHOULD NOT push or deliver roster items in >> this >> state, but instead SHOULD wait until contact has approved subscription >> request from user) " >> >> This is according to 9.2 from the users perspective so its talking >> about a >> roster item in the users roster? I dont get this section either. If the >> "owner" of a roster with a roster item in the subscription state "None + >> Pending in" sends a "roster get" should the owners server then hide this >> item? If thats the interpretation then if the owner had the same item in >> state "None" before the request was sent to the owner, that means the >> item >> went from visible to hidden without the owner doing anything other then >> being offline when receiving a subscription request? > > The user had created a roster item for the contact before the contact > subscribed the user? Hiding that item does not make sense, indeed. > I think the intended behaviour (not modifiyng the roster) is to deliver > the item with subscription=none and deliver the subscription request > from the contact after the roster result (see 3.1.3 rule 5 in -bis). > > philipp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpWIPMACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzn2wCePuTcSTzZLU4qv2xYHOl2/zB3 tu0AoOAtz88Xby3IarFKIL53ws02C/na =v+LY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
