-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why not use TLS-reconnect + XEP-0198 in that case? This would work as well, of course. I just thought that maybe it would be nice to not need the whole complexity of XEP-0198. But then again, code duplication is evil ;). (Same for spec duplication!) - -- Jonathan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAwAGBQJKW4hJAAoJEMtRg9d5cXHkb1oP/0363MsS2QeJC1lmGSKnIdbr 3MYfsw8A30NXigvP2+gHmWO28R6Z96NQ0fwKV3sx6BIe/x3GWS6AysS1l9/sGDG5 pQuCYnuaRu8xM/w12+7Ce8aKR7ka0i4k0U6h7DCNXuv3+sGX1oSE6qssZsNypBjg fEF4a9+uY0uvGt3KDn4Skhu0SpEclMw28EyKwcAKtuUYaQhHG6XttxQrSgAVBCIP Z1CeCkVR3NILUwg6ugxS+LKlBvT3i3WUZSuzZxJFTqFB2+1zshb2bxmUxWWmxmK7 W+SCSfPDQ//HfZ6el8muJL3u0HPj7ZmOBb5TzUHNneszgnpbLbGzwfFFQvSm94nl 7yQ+WVZIjGUZ6m9eHIkOS0Dw3u65/RH2u2rIJmX1bPsF3lJh2REBZPa2OupZ8DiO mlrNT50rpfybmvsirADdIX7czhV8V+CLuoMAEH8rECqea0TfIEo81pu+fcoDPets 0d38Qhif5+I5yZ/K6irvk4GcBn2GPoSkfdNdcLxuDb/Wm5ptqDzM+O+d5LlGwbTD nmhXN8POXO4uLfU5a1Co/ByEmBApIwKWV17sXQv4vAP2oJ/E9gfK4QKnNfug/rmM OF+5drShzl4AdzVFcKpjgItM028hDQ9lrqVcxS63MPJrjrAlZfOMVbr8Cozm3YLH +FAJT1hT/BkjM+WGcGHA =Jpr+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
