-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/13/09 4:57 PM, Fabio Forno wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Peter Saint-Andre<[email protected]> wrote: > >> I like the idea of being able to share roster items, introduce one >> person to another over IM, etc. But I'm not convinced that XEP-0144 >> solves compelling use cases. XEP-0093 was simpler and therefore better, >> IMHO. >> > > We have two use cases: > - exchange of business cards, where xep-0093 was good, since we don't > care if the items are processed > - roster sync with a component (it may be a transport, but also a > component hosting different services), and for that we'd like to see > the result of the operation
Right, but I keep wondering if modifying XEP-0093 to include the second use case was wrong... Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpbvGQACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwchgCfey+WKPauaUcWSwpM0ZLTl7M6 WeQAoJcfLvPVAnsCpP5BYc6gihdtkzcN =BMMW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
