-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/15/09 9:52 AM, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote: > Section 2.3 > > "3. If both parties send a candidate-used notification but the > candidates have a different priority, then the candidate with the > lower priority shall be considered the nominated candidate." > > Shouldn't the candidate with *higher* priority be nominated?
Yes! Sorry about the error. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpeC6wACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxV1QCgjzSfxETDaDznOnYGCcpQA782 N7YAn1gg8DsDbj4lh6jpmVEejNsOwrcN =I6zl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
