On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 09:55 +0900, Jason wrote: > For my current useage this spec is too limiting to physical locations. > parts of related specs allow for location types that are not > representable by "country/gps etc", things like URLs, or TIME. (you > can be conceptually @ a web location, time, or some other unknown, > perhaps virtual representation of location), it would be nice if this > spec were flexible enough to accomodate such notions.
You should probably re-read the spec: all the fields are optional. You can also provide a time, a uri and you have text and description fields at your disposition if the other ones are too restrictive. I understand that this was strictly designed with Earth locations in mind though. :) Pierre-Luc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
