On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Peter Saint-Andre<[email protected]> wrote: > In my working version of the spec, I now have: > > On public servers where the same JID is reused for multiple > anonymous sessions, the server MAY ignore the resource > identifier provided by the client (if any) and instead assign > a resource identifier that it generates on behalf of the client. > > OK?
Seems consistent with what we agreed tonight, thanks :) /K (sorry, got saved to drafts in the gmail outage, and never sent)
