-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 8/18/09 1:43 PM, Tobias Markmann wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Fabio Forno <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Compressing an encrypted stream is simply pointless: encryption
>     maximizes entropy, so you can't have any gain but consuming resources.
> 
> 
> I understand that but why enforcing it so much in the order, I mean
> tkabber for instance only works when compression is advertised before
> SASL with works nicely with ejabberd. Both projects supported
> compression before XEP-170 described how it should work.

The spec says that order is RECOMMENDED, not REQUIRED. Therefore
ejabberd and tkabber are in compliance. However, they would be more
compliant if they followed the recommended order. :)

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqmvVMACgkQNL8k5A2w/vx59gCg6Cne7R4vay6eXAptkTMYCNpH
yFgAn393DmwBCIVOM7IuOELKoDvD770i
=bDLk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to