-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/10/09 1:23 PM, Florian Zeitz wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> I propose adding the following informational (and self-explanatory) >> paragraph to the section on TCP Binding in 3920bis... > >> 4.6. Reliability > >> The use of long-lived TCP connections in XMPP implies that the >> sending of XML stanzas over XML streams can be unreliable, since the >> parties to a long-lived TCP connection might not discover a >> connectivity disruption in a timely manner. At the XMPP application >> layer, long connectivity disruptions can result in undelivered >> stanzas. Although the core XMPP technology defined in this >> specification does not contain features to overcome this lack of >> reliability, an XMPP extension for doing so is defined in [XEP-0198]. > > > > This sounds like a good idea to me. > I was wondering whether it might be a good idea to mention XEP-0184 too > though. > Possibly in a different context, maybe even in 3921bis. > It seems much more useful for the normal Instant Messaging case as long > as XEP-0198 is not widely deployed IMHO. OTOH not mentioning 184 might > be a way to increase 198 deployment...
I think that XEP-0198 applies more at the core streaming level (3920bis) and XEP-0184 applies more at the IM level (3921bis). Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqpVosACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxlEACeNbFbPgVEZQ8oxFweX3DmBgGL WIcAnjtcQii8b7DTIykDYOAJhVk26Og+ =otA0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
