-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 8/30/09 1:26 PM, Pedro Melo wrote: > > On 2009/08/30, at 18:46, Remko Tronçon wrote: > >>> There is not a single mention of SI inside 0047. >> >> There's also no mention of SI in the SOCKS5 protocol description ;-) >> The dependency flows in the other direction. > > There is no mention of IBB inside SI either. > > But ok, without something high-level you probably can't do much with it > on its own. > > I'll implement the parts that I need for jingle ibb transport and leave > the rest behind.
Just because XEP-0047 doesn't specify discovery of support for the "http://jabber.org/protocol/ibb"; namespace, does not mean that you can't use disco. It just means that we left it out of the spec. :) (In fact, many of the early specs probably still need to be reviewed and revised so that they mention things like entity capabilities, various security considerations, and yes even service discovery -- but that's a big job for which I've never really found the time.) However, if you are doing Jingle file transfer then I think you'd simply advertise support for the "urn:xmpp:jingle:transports:ibb:0" namespace. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqpqmEACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyHegCgsnnkK+waKC9B69tMlaSBRI6J kh4An04N9vFaNDNiytqUy+doibRXdsic =w626 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
