Our PEP implementation allows multiple items per node. We believe that the singleton node approach from XEP-60, section 12.20 gives you single-item nodes as a degenerate case.
On 10/15/09 9:53 AM, "Dirk Meyer" <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 9/29/09 10:05 AM, Peter Ferne wrote: >>> On 29 Sep 2009, at 17:03, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> >>>> I won't be convinced that XEP-0223 truly supersedes XEP-0049 until I see >>>> people actively using it for the same use cases... >>> >>> >>> Are you aware of any specific reasons why it hasn't gained traction, >>> other than inertia? >> >> No, I'm not. But I think we need some experimentation with the pubsub >> approach before we definitively kill off private XML storage. > > Stupid question: is there any pubsub server out there that supports > XEP-0223? XEP-0223 requires a pubsub server to have a virtual pubsub > service with pubsub#persist_items = true and pubsub#max_items > 1. AFAIK > pubsub servers only support PEP on the virtual server which makes no > sense without the ability to store more than one item. > > And there is the issue when to sync the private storage. See > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00000.html [1] > > > Dirk -- Joe Hildebrand
