On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Fabio Forno <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2) Pubsub. >> Votes outstanding from Dave, Matt, Ralph and Remko. >> Discussion about iq stanzas for delivery, how they don't give >> guaranteed delivery, and how XEP-0198 is a solution to the guaranteed >> delivery problem. >> Ralph -1 on the changes because of the iq issues. > There is no log of the discussion yet, isn't it? If so does anybody > has the log saved on the disk? I fear there is some misconception > about the use cases where <iq/>s are needed (basically: it's not about > reliability, but about having an immediate ack of delivery and XEP 198 > does not solve this).
There was, but only to the (publicly logged) council list. I have now remedied! /K
