On 2/19/10 10:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 2/17/10 10:23 PM, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>>
>> On 2/17/10 6:27 PM, "Matthew Wild" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>> This means that a client can also intentionally uncleanly disconnect, by
>>>> simply closing its socket and not sending </stream:stream>.  If the client
>>>> wants special presence while gone, it just needs to send presence (and
>>>> probably request ack) before hanging up.
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 to the above interpretation. I don't think there's anything extra
>>> we need to define, just clarify.
>>
>> +1.  I'd add that the presence you send before hanging up might want to have
>> priority -1, in case the client author hadn't considered that.
> 
> So we have three things here, in order of impact on the spec:
> 
> 1. A clarification regarding the difference between a cleanly closed
> stream (via an explicit </stream:stream>) and what Justin called a
> broken stream (I'd prefer a term like "unfinished"). This is a slight
> clarification, not even a fix.
> 
> 2. A correction to the initial value of 'h'. IMHO this is a relatively
> small fix, one step above an erratum.

Done:

http://xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0198-1.1.html

The diff will show up here at some point:

http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0198/diff/1.0/vs/1.1rc1

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to