On 2/25/10 3:29 AM, Fabio Forno wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Jonathan Schleifer > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 2. A sender SHOULD NOT include a request for message receipts unless >>> it knows (via Service Discovery [4] or Entity Capabilities [5]) that the >>> intended recipient supports the protocol described herein or unless the >>> use of message receipts is negotiated via Stanza Session Negotiation [6]. >> >> I agree that those two are not too useful. It might be desirable to send to >> the bare JID when the user's offline and get a receipt once he gets online >> again. > > Just a quick note about the "reliability" note. These modifications > suit better the semantics of message stanzas, but we also accept that > we can miss receipts for messages which are actually delivered (just > to remember that when we need a prompt ack from an online resource iq > pubsub events work better).
That's a good point. Currently XEP-0184 doesn't provide very helpful advice about how much reliability you can expect from message receipts. I think we can improve the text in that note. Suggestions welcome. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
