On Mar 8, 2010, at 7:52 AM, Tomasz Sterna wrote: > Dnia 2010-03-08, pon o godzinie 15:10 +0000, Matthew Wild pisze: >> Yay, I'm not alone in thinking that each implementation need not >> support *every* published XEP :) > > Unfortunately this point of view is not shared by software users. > They tend to compare implementations by counting features. > This leads to a race of implementing every possible XEP, no matter how > silly or useless the idea is.
One can always write a useless implementation of useless specifications. :-) I can think of a number of ways this specification could be uselessly implemented. -- Kurt
