On Fri Mar 12 11:11:01 2010, Nicolas Vérité wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:07, Dave Cridland <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Fri Mar 12 10:52:06 2010, Laurent Eschenauer wrote:
>>
>> Am I missing a point ? Any other work or proposal already
tackling this ?
>
>
http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-xmpp-3921bis-05.html#message-syntax-type
>
> * headline -- [...] The receiving server SHOULD deliver the
message to all
> of the recipient's available resources.HTH,
It will not be an offline message though, right?
Well, it's a server-side policy decision that's optional, see:
http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-xmpp-3921bis-05.html#rules-barejid-noresource-message
[...] [It] MUST either (a) add the message to offline storage or (b)
silently discard the message [...].
In the case of M-Link, for instance, it's a personal option with a
server-wide default, which is in turn off by default, since that
seemed to be the common behaviour.
So yes, headline may be problematic in terms of offline storage.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[email protected] - xmpp:[email protected]
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
