On Tue Apr 13 15:11:12 2010, Matthew Wild wrote:
I (nobody ask me why)
Why?
Oh, sorry.
recently implemented a server-side IBB->TCP proxy. Everything went
smoothly, and it actually maps quite nicely, given that it is
already bidirectional.
One noticeable thing lacking though is a way to close a stream with
an error. I can add this data in a new namespace, but it struck me
that it might be useful to specify either a way to add an error to
a <close/> stanza, or simply (but perhaps less cleanly, as it only
works in direct reply to an incoming data packet) specify that a
stream is closed if any type="error" stanza is received in reply to
a sent stanza.
Thoughts?
Should an error close or half-close?
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[email protected] - xmpp:[email protected]
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
