On 4/27/10 4:06 PM, Tomasz Sterna wrote: > Dnia 2010-04-27, wto o godzinie 15:56 +0100, Artur Hefczyc pisze: >> My understanding of this is that: the server supports both >> jabber:client and >> jabber:server namespaces. >> 'OR' returns false if both sides of the OR are false. Therefore, if >> the server >> receives jabber:client packet over s2s stream it should still be >> acceptable >> because this 'first-level child element' is supported by the server >> which fulfils >> the first requirement. > > This is also how jabberd2 is handling incoming packets. > Is there a real advantage of not accepting jabber:client packets on S2S > connection, while still blindly converting jabber:server to > jabber:client?
I assume that even if we allowed 'jabber:client' stanzas over 'jabber:server' streams, we would not allow 'jabber:server' stanzas over 'jabber:client' streams. At which point everything becomes 'jabber:client', in a way... Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
