On 7/16/10 3:58 PM, Waqas Hussain wrote:

> I'd love that. Not having a fixed timestamp was one reason last
> activity didn't make it into XEP-0227 (IIRC it was the only data
> servers commonly stored which didn't make it into the current version
> of the XEP). The relative-to-now time it currently uses is awkward in
> various ways. Servers internally store timestamps, not 'seconds', and
> I suspect clients convert 'seconds' to timestamps on receiving last
> activity.

Thanks for the feedback, Waqas. Now, shall we update XEP-0012 or define
a new extension in a new namespace?

/psa

Reply via email to