On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Guus der Kinderen <[email protected]> wrote: > First thoughts: perhaps you should add a section that informs how to handle > child elements of the message stanza other than <body>. XHTML-IM adds an > child element that's typically related to the message body content, for > example. Other child elements might not (nicknames, for example). Should the > XEP allow overriding other child elements like that (for XHTML-IM, I would > think so). What should be the business rules if: > > the original stanza contains such additional child elements, and the > replacement one has not? > the original stanza does not contains suchs additional child elements, but > the replacement one does? > both stanzas have different additional child elements?
Thanks - I've put in some placeholder text for this. Roughly - senders MUST send the same stanza, just corrected. /K
