On 08/19/2010 12:14 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 8/17/10 6:15 AM, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
On 08/17/2010 02:03 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 17 August 2010 12:52, Peter Saint-Andre<[email protected]> wrote:
On 8/17/10 5:37 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
Also I've had bad experience (as a user) with transfer resumption thus
far... I think some clients just ignore the range, and send from 0,
causing the range-supporting recipient to receive the start of the
file twice. So either we make range support mandatory, or we need some
way for the initiator to announce it.
If anything, I'd prefer to remove ranges from XEP-0096. Do any clients
support them?
Without checking, I believe Miranda and Gajim do.
Matthew
Yep Gajim supports that to resume a transfer.
Hi Yann, thanks for the confirmation. Is this feature useful? Does it
improve the user experience? Does it make file transfer more reliable?
Does it introduce complexities into the code? Is the cost worth the
benefit? Just curious. :)
Peter
Yep it's nice to be able to resume a file transfer when you're
disconnected while transferring a big file.
It doesn't introduce a lot of complexity.
So I'm clearly in favor of keep such a functionality
--
Yann
