On 21 September 2010 16:36, Evgeniy Khramtsov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Regarding other your comments and comments from the Council discussion: it > seems like the most problematic part is reporting mechanism. The other problematic part was that 3 technically-minded people thought the subcription request in the example was part of the protocol. I think perhaps a solution would be to expand this into several step-by-step examples. Show the original subscription request received by the sender's server (no markers), then show it being marked by one filter, another filter, etc. I think this would give a clearer overview to people about how the protocol is meant to work. Matthew
