On 9/29/10 7:09 PM, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 16:12:59 bschumac wrote:
The specification is clearly ambiguous about this, given that it only
refers to an "entity" but doesn't define what an entity is.
Right. Ordering is important enough that I think this issue deserves more
than one sentence in the RFC.
It seems our choices are:
1) "Entity" is a Full JID. Resource locking (RFC 3921) and MUC (XEP-0045)
need repairs, or we just live with their problems and try not to repeat them.
2) "Entity" is a Bare JID. Everything works as Jeremy Himself intended.
Can developers of various servers describe their current ordering policies?
It would be interesting to see just how the spec has been interpretted so far.
XCP uses the second approach with great success. It is, as you
originally stated it, "optimized, threaded, clustered, etc." and from
the standpoint of our users works as expected.
Cheers,
Ben
