On Wed Oct 13 13:05:43 2010, Philipp Hancke wrote:
David Richards wrote:
Also, step 10 in section 3, xep-0178 conflicts with 3920bis step
9 in section 9.2.2. 178 indicates inclusion of authorization
identity matching the from attribute of the server1 to server2
stream element while 3920bis indicates an empty authorization
identity.
I think the best strategy (right now) is to include the
authorization identity when sending (for backward compability
reasons) and to ignore it (and use the stream's 'from') as a
receiver.
No, as a server you MUST use the authorization identifier if
provided. However, the sender MUST make these the same.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[email protected] - xmpp:[email protected]
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
