On Nov 9, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote: > It was added at the request of another implementor. I'll let them (assuming > they are on this list) to present an argument for its continued inclusion.
I think where this comes from is the desire not to have a choice of "None" but a choice "XXX" (no label) where "XXX" means something in the context of the applicable security policy. -- Kurt
