On 11/10/10 9:55 PM, Tuomas Koski wrote: > Hi, > > On 10 November 2010 13:30, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: >> Personally, I consider the two stanzas - occupant to MUC, and MUC to >> occupants - to be distinct, just having the same (or similar, at least) >> payloads - and therefore have different ids (indeed, different per >> occupant). Everyone else seems to consider this a silly idea. > > Just to let you know, you are not alone. I would have implemented it > like that as well (having different ids).
Yes, I think they would be different per occupant. How can the MUC service track errors otherwise? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
