On 2/22/11 12:03 PM, Joe Hildebrand wrote: > On 2/22/11 5:09 AM, "Hannes Tschofenig" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Aren't there XMPP implementations in the browser already out there? >> Example: Strophe http://code.stanziq.com/strophe/ >> >> So, what are you guys planning to do on top of it? > > Those implementations use BOSH (XEP-124 and XEP-206) to tunnel XMPP over > HTTP. Having a full XMPP stream on a single TCP socket can be more > efficient, secure, and easier to deploy. The nice thing is that > implementations could choose to fall back on BOSH if XMPP-in-browser didn't > work.
Right. This "XMPP in the browser" meme is about native XMPP-Over-TCP support in browsers, not XMPP-Over-BOSH support. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
