On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Matthew A. Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > I appreciate your argument, but do not accept it. I've been on the > receiving end of copyright and IP lawyers, and thus influences my current > caution. > > Regardless, this part of the discussion is off-topic. My main point is the > spec > needs more work, in strong preference to the code.
Fair enough. From now on, I'll focus on an excellent spec first. Note: About legal concerns, if anyone wants to discuss this, contact me privately for attribution verifications before I release the code.
