On 4/14/11 7:41 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 4/14/11 5:45 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote: >> Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>>>> Preferably, the receiving server would not include the old namespace >>>>> at all >>>>> on the stream in response to a 1.0 stream. It just confuses matters. >>>>> And >>>>> on stream restarts, the old ns should not be used at all by either >>>>> side. >>> >>> Ah, I see what you mean -- if you *know* that the other side knows about >>> XMPP 1.0 then use the stream feature exclusively. >> >> which is a problem because the dialback stream feature is an >> afterthought and not "xmpp 1.0". > > Stream features are 1.0, but the dialback stream feature is not. > >> I would propose to get rid of the first bullet (and associated text) in >> section 2.3. This "new" method of signalling support for dialback does >> not offer any advantages. >> That way, the stream feature is only used to signal support for dialback >> error handling. > > I think that would be OK.
I'm going to push out a revised XEP shortly to fix this matter. After that I hope we can finally publish this as a Draft spec. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
