On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Mark Rejhon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Certain operational networks we support cannot deal with the extra >> traffic. >> >> > That said, I agree -- it is going to be added to the spec in due time, >> > well before XMPP RTT clients become popular. >> >> I see reason why a basic yes/no negotiation of the extension cannot be >> added now, whether by iq or by caps or some other appropriate mechanism. If >> it needs to change later, fine. But please add something now. > > Servers can inject event='stop' to achieve the same thing. Problem solved? > (We don't condone this. XMPP RTT may interoperate with 911 services, as a > replacement for deaf TDD/TTY legal requirements.)
In that case, surely negotiation is vital and urgent? /K
