On 7/21/11 10:03 AM, "Dave Cridland" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Really, there are cases where unlocking on presence isn't the right > thing to do, but if in doubt, unlocking is the safest option. > > We have a clear example of when not to unlock that we all agree on. > > I think we can move on. I don't agree. How to route is completely up to the server. There are servers that do aggressively interesting processing of the contents of the presence update, and there is no way (short of the <primary/> thing from XEP-168) for the client to know when my primary resource has changed. -- Joe Hildebrand
