On Jul 26, 2011, at 16:57, Matthew Wild wrote:

> On 19 July 2011 21:42, Glenn Maynard <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Matthew A. Miller
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Sending at that rate will result in a disconnected socket for most of the
>>> networks I've seen.  There are still an exorbitant number of routers,
>>> proxies, firewalls, and load balancers deployed and configured such that
>>> they will (silently!) drop a connection if there is no traffic for 5-10
>>> minutes.
>> 
>> I've never encountered a network that'll disconnect with 10-15-minute
>> keepalives; there may be some, but I doubt "most".
>> 
> 
> A few weeks ago I was completely with you. But I just moved into an
> office where idle connections randomly die - I now have 15 *second*
> ping-pongs on SSH connections just to make sure they stay open. It's
> looking like I'm going to have to do the same for XMPP too.
> 
> I'm sharing the office with a fairly competent technology company, the
> last place I would have expected such a broken network configuration -
> but there you have it. Some people think HTTP is the internet :)
> 

I tried to warn y'all... (-:


- m&m
<http://goo.gl/voEzk>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to