On Tue Aug 16 16:12:34 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 8/16/11 3:35 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Mon Aug 15 22:57:59 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> > 2) We also need to consider that many clients only handle one
status
>> > code.
>>
>> Which one do they handle?
>>
>>
> I mean they will only process one in a set. Sometimes they ignore
all
> but the first. Sometimes they ignore all but the last.
Um, isn't that called a bug?
Sure. But it certainly used to be sufficiently prevelant that you
couldn't build a MUC implementation without taking it into account.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[email protected] - xmpp:[email protected]
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
