On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:32:53 AM Sergey Dobrov wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 02:56 AM, Justin Karneges wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 04:16:29 AM Sergey Dobrov wrote:
> > 
> > By dynamic node, I just mean the node can accept parameters when
> > fulfilling requests.
> > 
> > I guess you could write some reusable code that marshals the parameters
> > (i.e. popping them off the end of a node name).  But, which parameters
> > are possible and how the parameters shall be honored is node-specific,
> > so there's not really much more generic code you can write.
> 
> Do you mean that pubsub service which serves commenting node should be
> not a generic pubsub service but some specific?
> 
> Then, I don't really understand what is necessity of XEP-303 at all. In
> the XEP-277 is already defined a way how to comment on microblog posts,
> why not to use the same way, why is needed another entity?
> 
> Then, some things in XEP-303 are just corrections for XEP-60 which will
> bring mess in standards and pubsub developers will not know where to
> find proper specification which will lead to incompatibilities in
> different pubsub implementation.
> 
> About dynamic nodes, I think that it's completely unnecessary thing and
> it's enough to define the way to sort on created or modified time in the
> XEP-60 itself. But I really afraid about that inconsistency which may be
> invented with such XEPs as 303 (277 too, he-he).
> 
> And, maybe it will be useful to make possible to make some hooks on item
> publishing to validate posted data but that's a subject for another thread.

IMO, the commenting approach described in XEP-277 is too simple and rather 
uninspired (full disclaimer: I work at a company whose sole product is 
commenting).  Commenting is similar, but not identical to microblogging, and 
the two deserve separate specs.  Probably the commenting section in XEP-277 
should be exchanged with a pointer to XEP-303.

Anyway, are you saying that all of the functional requirements of XEP-303 
could be extracted out into separate smaller "reusable" extensions that 
implementors of generic XEP-60 servers might embrace?  Really ejabberd might 
add an extension that mirrors VCards content in Atom entries?  I guess in 
theory that would be cool, but it seems a bit on the dreamy side.

-Justin

Reply via email to