On 12/13/2011 02:28 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Sergey Dobrov <[email protected]> wrote: >> The problem I have now is to understand the process to understand how >> can be done the same process for the PEP. And I testing on two ejabberds >> (2.1.7/2.1.9) that installed in my local network for testing purposes >> and I see that if A logs out and then logs in when B is permanently >> online then B sees only first A's status and never sees if changes >> status even if A logs out again, B still see like A is online! Have I to >> post a but to ejabberd or this is some kind of the protocol bug? > > See my earlier post with pointer to the appropriate RFC sections - the > server must transmit all of A's broadcast presences to B if B is in > A's roster with appropriate subscription state. > > /K > So that's a ejabberd bug and ejabberd must send presence changes forever since it received probe, right?
-- With best regards, Sergey Dobrov, XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.
