On 1/19/12 8:11 AM, Ralph Meijer wrote: > On 2012-01-19 15:49 , Kevin Smith wrote: >> Redefining the meaning of 'room JID' seems unwise at this stage >> (especially as it seems we then continue to use the current meaning >> elsewhere in the document). *** > > The previous naming was very confusing. The 'Room JID' should be the JID > that represents the room itself, without the resource part. Having a new > 'Occupant JID' to denote the entity's JID within the room (i.e. Room JID > + nick as resource) is very much clearer, to me.
Clarity was the point of that change. > When working on the MUC client implementation in Wokkel, I was now able > to use consistent names for variables matching these terms. This made it > so much more readable. > > If the renaming hasn't been done consistently throughout XEP-0045, that > should obviously be addressed. Perhaps even the spec author got confused! I've just double-checked all instances and it does seem that I did not make this change consistently throughout the document. Fixed in my working copy. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
