On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/6/12 2:53 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: > >> I also think that technically, this XEP should be "deprecated" rather >> than "obsoleted" - it is out of date, rather than wrong. > > Changing the status of a XEP to Obsolete does mean the protocol is > wrong, it means that you shouldn't implement the spec.
There's a "not" missing here. I had the same concern about "deprecated" vs "obsoleted", so I checked XEP-0001 and decided obsoleted was fine (although I grant we skipped the deprecated step that we should have taken if we were being precise). /K
