On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Matthew Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 29, 2012, at 09:35, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> I'm not a big fan of invisibility, but if we're going to do it then we >> might as well do it right. >> >> Some clients and servers use XEP-0018, but it violates the core XMPP >> specs, which seems like a bad idea. >> >> Some clients and server use privacy lists (XEP-0016 + XEP-0126), but >> they're complicated and I'd prefer to deprecate them if possible (that's >> really a separate discussion topic). >> >> Years ago I defined a "better" solution in XEP-0186, but we never pushed >> it forward from Experimental to Draft. I don't know if any clients and >> servers include support for XEP-0186, but if so it would be good to >> know. In any case, I'm wondering if folks are interested in seeing >> XEP-0186 move to Draft so that we can deprecate XEP-0018 and XEP-0126. >> >> Thoughts? > > Simpler invisibility would be very nice.
How would one make it simpler? 186 is already just one stanza. /K
