On 5/24/12 8:44 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 5/24/12 1:01 AM, Sergey Dobrov wrote: >> On 05/23/2012 04:45 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> Old thread alert! >>> >>> >>> Well, the spec says that the length restriction applies to the >>> base64-encoded data, so I think we meant that this does *not* apply to >>> the raw data. However, you seem to be saying that this might be >>> difficult to implement. Have other folks experienced this problem? >> >> Have other folks experienced this problem implementing things right ;) >> >> I know that some implementations (maybe all?) measure raw data and not >> base64. > > If that's what all code does now, then I think it's fine for us to > update the spec so that it reflects reality.
Does anyone object to making this change in the spec? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
