On 6/17/12 10:53 PM, Lance Stout wrote: > Reading over XEP-0300 yesterday, I noticed that in the examples the namespace > pattern "urn:xmpp:hash-function-textual-names:*" is used whereas in the main > text > the pattern "urn:xmpp:hash-function-text-names:*" is used. > > I'm assuming that the prose version is supposed to be normative and the > examples > should be updated to match?
Hi Lance, Good catch. It is supposed to be hash-function-text-names since that is the title of the IANA registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/hash-function-text-names/hash-function-text-names.xml I am still trying to convince the IANA to register their own URN scheme, so we might not need to mint a URN for this usage in the xmpp tree. I'll poke my IANA contact about that again right now. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
