Yeah - sorry about that! I had two copies of it on my file system and of course sod's law meant that I sent the wrong one!
Thanks to Peter for updating it! --- Ash On 19/06/2012 17:47, "Todd Herman" <[email protected]> wrote: >I was going to say. There were no periods and parts had "blah blah blah" >in it. :) > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 12:34 PM >To: XMPP Standards >Subject: Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Security Labels in >PubSub > >The authors had sent me an outdated version. I've pushed a revised >version to the website. > >On 6/19/12 10:17 AM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: >> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. >> >> Title: Security Labels in PubSub >> >> Abstract: This document describes an extension to XEP-0258 (Security >>Labels in XMPP) to allow for the use of security labels in PubSub. This >>document describes >> how security label metadata can be applied to the various elements >>within PubSub, including nodes and items. >> >> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/pubsub-labels.html >> >> The XMPP Council will decide in the next two weeks whether to accept >>this proposal as an official XEP. >> >
