Op 27/06/2012 10:59, Kevin Smith schreef:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Mark Rejhon <[email protected]> wrote:
I used to have a number there a year ago. I was told it's not a good idea
to define an arbitrary limit, so I don't think I should mention a specific
value, except general wording that it should be sufficiently small enough to
avoid becoming a congestion consideration.
The question is what wording to choose...
We shouldn't have numbers as arbitrary limits in normative language.
It's reasonable to have text like
"""
Real-world testing has shown that 1000 characters is a reasonable
limit for the length of RTT messages, and it is suggested that clients
use this default.
"""
but not
"""
RTT messages SHOULD be limited to 1000 characters
"""
/K
And Chinese , Thais and japanse language ?
