On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Mark Rejhon <[email protected]> wrote:
> If vendors decide to implement video/audio *and* RTT in the same software --
> then a main accessibility concern is vendors that enable audio/video support
> by default, but block the ability to initiate an RTT conversation (i.e.
> non-compliance with Section 5 of XEP-0301).
> ...That is, a situation of preventing senders from having any opportunity to
> initiate RTT, and preventing recipients from being able to be informed that
> an incoming RTT attempt is occuring.    That is the one that becomes the
> discriminatory issue.

This seems like a bizarre situation to imagine happening - you're
describing an application that implements RTT but doesn't allow its
users to use it, as far as I can see. It seems unlikely that anyone
would go to this effort.

/K

Reply via email to