Gregg is correct, too.

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden <[email protected]>wrote:

>   *but please also don't call messaging 'real time' because it isn't.
> It is "instant delivery of a message"  but it is messaging - not real time
> conversation.  *
>

Pre-emptive reply, since "real-time" can be subject to interpretation.
We are going by the International Telecommunications Union definition of
"real-time" of being less than 1 second latency.
See ITU-T Rec. F.700, "Multimedia Conversational Services", section 2.1.2.1

So, according to ITU-T, instant messaging is NOT real-time -- required for
true "CONVERSATIONAL" interactivity.

....Deaf people used to use TTY a lot more before. (sometimes called TDD or
text telephones -- often used in conjunction with voice, or without,
depending on deaf individual).  Fewer deaf people use TTY now, due to the
widespread availability of cell phones and Internet.
....Some (not all) deaf people, like me, have regressed to being forced to
do line-by-line messaging because real-time text is not as common on the
Internet as it was during the TTY days / BBS days / Unix Talk days /
terminal days.   Introducing XEP-0301 provides the true real-time (1-second
latency) capabilities back to my every-day communications, including future
telephone relay services (Wikipedia: "Telecommunications Relay Services")
-- whether I am calling Pizza Hut, or contacting 9-1-1, or calling your
home phone, since the operator reads out what I am typing.
....Some of the Internet based relay services (Google: "IP Relay") are
using proprietary real-time text standards, and I'd rather them use
XEP-0301, so that we can create/use the software we can all choose, whether
laptops or cellphones.
....Likewise, we'd also like to be able to message directly to people, if
the other party has an XEP-0301 compatible client, too, and if they have it
enabled.  So we have a big interest in keeping chat software "Accessible"
(and are also modifying other accessibility legislation too -- some of our
group have met with U.S. government officials, etc) -- because we need
modern real-time (as defined by ITU-T F.700) methods of communications --
some of us are not using as much as before.

Sincerely,
Mark Rejhon

Reply via email to