I think it is better to capture both audiences -- and not make this about just one group but I see how you want accessible to stand out
how about Accessible - and mainstream too. Gregg -------------------------------------------------------- Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D. Director Trace R&D Center Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering and Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project http://Raisingthefloor.org --- http://GPII.net On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Mark Rejhon wrote: > 5. Section 2.4, Title. Change to "Usable for mainstream and accessibility > purposes." > > The current heading is a single word: "Accessible" -- I prefer to keep it > because it's correct, clear, and short. It catches attention of the > accessibility people better, including the Access Board that has already > contacted us, about the specification too. The word 'mainstream" is also > mentioned at end of section 1, also even in section 2.4, in section 6.2. I > therefore believe that I've carefully balanced accessibility and mainstream, > and satisfied both targets, while aiming to achieve the goal of eventually > becoming an important part of future Accessibility standards. > (That said, I'll fix the first bullet) >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
