On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > I've just reviewed XEP-0297 (Stanza Forwarding) and I think it looks > good. One small comment, it would be good to describe briefly the kinds > of extensions that might re-use this format, and specifically to cite > draft-miller-xmpp-e2e. > > In Sections 4.1 and 4.2, we use the word "trust", which I find to be > void for vagueness and thus impossible to operationalize. IMHO it would > be better to phrase this in terms of how the receiving entity needs to > behave (e.g., drop the message without showing it to a human).
"An entity cannot trust that forwards are genuine when receiving them unprovoked (i.e. outside the scope of another specification) and SHOULD NOT process them automatically." ? /K
