> > I still don't understand your resistance to disco, and the argument "the >> software is buggy!" is specious at best. >> >> No, no -- this one is different, evaluated from a different perspective. > This is a completely different matter from the "fallback method", as this > list simply illustrates optimization to the protocol for maximum > compatibility between a variety of combinations of *XEP-0301 and XEP-0301*-- > it is not something any of my implementations ever plans to do. (the > fallback method is for a completely different reason). >
Oops, XEP-0301 and XEP-0308.
