On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Gregg Vanderheiden <[email protected]>wrote:
> I agree > > the word by word is often brought up -- but never implemented. It make > little sense to add this here and confuse the discussion. You can't do > word by word without XEP-0301 == and if doing XEP-0301 you can do NT or > WbWord or SbSentence or CbClause whatever you want. But I would not get > into discussing or mentioning them except to say that you can allow any of > them as options in a client but should be on the receiving side as a > preference. > > Talking about doing word by word but sending fragments if person is slow > etc is just confusing this standard. Keep it simple I think. > That's why I kept the Introductory Example quite simple for this. In order of preference, I like: 1. Natural Typing 2. Time-Smoothed 3. Word Transmission 4. Fragment Transmission 5. Whole Message Transmission (unless in an "email" mood) The Introduction goes as high as possible (#3) without going into the complicated territory. Right now, votes are roughly evenly split (half a dozen Yea's, and half a dozen Nay's over the last 2 years), and I refuse to budget at the moment, barring a huge vote surge in one direction or another.... Mark Rejhon
