On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Gunnar Hellström <[email protected]> wrote: > <GH>No, please make a MUST for id= in edit previous. I can imagine > presentation cases when it is absolutely necessary to know what message the > edits belong to. Why do you want to introduce so many options? Strict > requirements are usually much more fruitful.
Kevin needs to explain why a third disco case was needed. I don't see it as a LC holdup, and it will be a while before 0301+0308 implementations show up, so leaving it unchanged to 0.6 which is already in freeze & being converted for emailing to Peter.... Thanks Mark rejhon
